Chiefs fan since the ’90s. Raconteur, troublemaker and general loudmouth who makes adhering to Rule 9 a way of life. AG’s resident Fool on the Hill.
My mind can be changed, but only by proper application of facts and reason. (Hint: If you are internet-arguing, it won’t happen.)
I can be reached by adding (at)Yahoo.com to the end of my screen name. That includes if you want me to edit your fanpost, and I’ll treat it just like any other piece from the regular writers that “crosses my desk”.
I’m going to make a political point here, but it isn’t partisan. This is educational, because a lot of the variants can qualify for “assault weapon” ban inclusion, while others are exempt. The main thing, the Magnum model that wasn’t popular anyway, the capabilities of every one of them that do not require an FFL (suppressed and pistol versions) are identical. Nothing makes one more lethal than the others, because the internals are identical.
And if you still support cosmetic bans as media stunts and stepping stones they are, I don’t know what to say, because while the issue is political, I haven’t said anything about anyone in either party, I stuck to the realities of physics and law. So if that’s the case, don’t come argue with me from a position outside those technical realities. Nothing to do with society or safety, or I won’t answer.
Ya, there is no real ‘assault” weapon. What the left means is basically fully automatic style 1000 rounds a minute , military type guns that most folks can not attain
I’m going to make a political point here, but it isn’t partisan. This is educational, because a lot of the variants can qualify for “assault weapon” ban inclusion, while others are exempt. The main thing, the Magnum model that wasn’t popular anyway, the capabilities of every one of them that do not require an FFL (suppressed and pistol versions) are identical. Nothing makes one more lethal than the others, because the internals are identical.
And if you still support cosmetic bans as media stunts and stepping stones they are, I don’t know what to say, because while the issue is political, I haven’t said anything about anyone in either party, I stuck to the realities of physics and law. So if that’s the case, don’t come argue with me from a position outside those technical realities. Nothing to do with society or safety, or I won’t answer.
Ya, there is no real ‘assault” weapon. What the left means is basically fully automatic style 1000 rounds a minute , military type guns that most folks can not attain
this never gets old