FYI: Rashee Rice update: Chiefs WR eligible to play in 2024 season, unlikely to face immediate suspension (msn.com)
236 repliesFor months, all signs have pointed to Rashee Rice facing a multigame suspension for his role in a high-speed hit-and-run crash that occurred this spring. With only a week until the start of the 2024 NFL season, however, the Kansas City Chiefs wide receiver is eligible to take the field as usual, with league executives hinting Thursday that Rice will avoid immediate punishment related to the incident.
About Author
it’s late, love you BRaG, but you are not infallible, saints can suck my taint, peace out to all else :)
I’m tired of trying to reason with people who keep saying I’m unreasonable. Later.
typical , take your ball and go home schtick . I expect nothing less
he engaged plenty, getting last word in w/o context is sibling BS, you wanna go another round?
fucker (normally a compliment)
piss off
like you cry persecution for being a jerk
I don’t cry about anything. If he got half the hate I get on here, he would be in an institution. Dude is fragile AF
self awareness is a thing, look into it
next time I cry and hide behind some mental charade after a couple people ”picked on me” in a thread, feel free to call me out. Deal?
double dog dare?
you cried plenty about “libtards” etc ganging up on you, and you duck and run as well as anyone, so I’m willing to go down this useless road,
are you?
that does not match what you just said, nor respond to my observation
Royals blow another one
looks like it
but we only need to win one of the 4
Singer pitched well
This Royals pitcher has zero control
Shreiber?
the guy before him
ecgic
Let’s Go Royals !!!!!
(clap, clap, clap-clap-clap)
It worked
3-2 Royals
I do what I can.
Best start searching for Rally Mantis III, just in case.
Not sure if it counts, as it isn’t “Rally Mantis,” but here’s what I’ve got:
hahhahhahahha
Actually I had a mantis fly in the kitchen one morning a few weeks ago and was trying to leave via the hitchen window
a good 5 inches
I collected him/her and sent it back out in the world
bubic closes out the 7th
Mizzou up 38-0
Oh yeah college football has started.
Saturday KSU and Michigan play (but not each other).
hahhahahha
I will root for KSU
not so much Michigan
Who wins the Pac-2
that will be an awesome race to the conference title
I understand, because of Harbaugh and our unfortunate history against him.
But it’s where I went to grad school, and I have a lot of friends there as well.
I like the team, even if not so much Harbaugh and the fact that Tom Brady is an alum.
I have no ties to any college
Community College of the Air Force is sorta worldwide :)
haha Bregman just got tossed for arguing balls and strikes
Causing problems at ANC. Unreal.
McSnuffles Videos at Arlington Stir More Fallout After Grave Site Visit
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-videos-arlington-stir-more-113122006.html
The family of a Green Beret who died by suicide after serving eight combat tours and is buried at Arlington National Cemetery expressed concern Wednesday that Horsey McSnuffles’s campaign had filmed his grave site without permission as McSnuffles stood in an area where campaign photography isn’t allowed.
(“McSnuffles” is a product of a browser plug in that changes Trump’s name to “Horsey McSnuffles” and his picture to kittens)
that is a life hard lived
how any vet or current service member can advocate for the man is beyond me
Agreed
He didn’t want to go to ANC when he had a moral obligation as CiC, but for a photo op to make himself look good? He’s right there.
Those Mar-a-Lago golf balls weren’t going to hit themselves.
i get you don’t like the fucking asshole that he is….but your voting stance invites a second term of him…that alone compels a stance, does it not?
In 1866, President Andrew Johnson promoted Grant to General of the Army. Later, Grant broke with Johnson over Reconstruction policies. A war hero, drawn in by his sense of duty, Grant was unanimously nominated by the Republican Party and then elected president in 1868.
As president, Grant stabilized the post-war national economy, supported congressional Reconstruction and the Fifteenth Amendment, and prosecuted the Ku Klux Klan. Under Grant, the Union was completely restored. He appointed African Americans and Jewish Americans to prominent federal offices. In 1871, he created the first Civil Service Commission, advancing the civil service more than any prior president.
Especially when the one’s right hand somehow diminishes the other’s for not having served, when they did serve, they just didn’t deploy.
Different experiences =/= lack of experience, necessarily.
I defer to all who have.
Some of the all-around best people I know served but didn’t deploy.
I’d trust them with my life and I’m glad I served with them.
I don’t even understand this arguement
I served 4 years and the only war was Grenada
were a million US troops needed for that?
Vance is accusing Walz of “stolen valor” because the latter, though he served for 24(?) years and became a senior NCO, didn’t deploy.
Deployment does not a military career make.
I know the stupid arguement
but serving is serving
My job was communications between Strategic Air Command B-52 Nuclear Bomber bases
If I had served like this asinine arguement
there would be NO assinine arguement cause we are all dead
My bad, I thought you didn’t know what was going on between the two.
actually this whole thought is wrapped up in the movie Paths of Glory with Kirk Douglas
the endless deaths of young men to pave some political appt of some French General in WWI
well hell, you could have ended all this bickering decades ago….fucker
Confound you, Steve, and doing your job!
Confound you, I say!
same thought :)
could have switched some of those damn magnets codes and sent
their claiming he abandoned his unit by retiring 3 months before the unit got deployment orders,,,which is stupid
to be clear, I was referring to service, regardless deployment
I understood what you meant, friend. I wasn’t trying to imply otherwise.
Vance, on the other hand…
just making sure, and I do not denigrate Vance’s either, but tey are not equivalent
The intensity of your opinion does not increase the accuracy of it.
I don’t tell others how to vote. Please reciprocate the courtesy
Not HOW
Just TO
And if I choose to vote for John Galt?
Or Ron Paul? Tim Scott?
At its barest essence, isn’t voting making our voices heard? And isn’t that what we’re doing by not voting for someone who everyone thinks is Jesus and someone else who thinks they are Jesus?
oh lord
My sweet lord.
You were saying?
The judge ruled this song to be inadmissible as evidence of common origin, so George just bought that catalog.
Dunno about anyone else, but I’m backing the guy guy who nobody thinks is Jesus, not even himself. Picking between a pair of evils because only one evil can win and you want to back a winner is poor logic, because it only keeps evil in power.
Why not vote for someone who’s not evil, instead? Enough folks do that and maybe we’d have an alternative to the twin evils. But that’s apparently stupid, because you have to support evil because only evil can actually win. So evil always wins, and that’s the smart way to do it, because eventually you’ll get someone actually good in there. Somehow, which is never explained.
So it seems that opposing evil is stupid. Who knew?
who would that be,if you don’t mind me asking?
also the “evil” thing is concerning
“By their fruits ye shall know them” is on full display with the DNRNC, and both are eagerly hoping for the chance to reduce our rights and control us more.
The Reps are no better, but the “non-evil” Dems desperately want Section 230 to be eliminated so that people like Tony can be held liable for anything some jackass puts in the comments here, and fuck free speech. That’s just the tip of the iceberg, but with either “real” candidate, that’s what you’re voting for, people who will do that to us. Hold sites accountable for all comments content, regardless of who actually says what. Third party liability FTW.
I can’t vote for that kind of thing at all. That you will support that with your vote is on you, I oppose it.
Get a voting booth :)
so wild west rules by either side, because the no-left party will, is, doing the same shit, you know this
And that’s why I plan on voting for Oliver, because it’s a vote for someone who won’t be like that.
a waste of a vote, might as well write in Mr Rogers, useless
It’s not a waste at all, because I’m literally voting my conscience and principles.
Or are free, honest elections and voting abhorrent to you? Why not eliminate third parties entirely, ban the from politics, and require you to vote the way you expect me to? Putin is a fan of limiting options as much as possible too, you know.
It’s your vote that’s useless, because you’re voting for more of the same instead of a productive change. It doesn’t have to be this way, the way you insist. Enough support elsewhere can change the system, so I’m voting for actual change. Time to clean house.
practicality,
I wish we has a multiparty coalition gov’t…we do not, I pick the best option on display
“I pick the
bestreally evil but slightly less evil in my opinion option on display”FTFY
fine, should I go with the greater?
It’s not a waste, it’s just way too late in the process. The choice should have been made during primary season, but a 3rd or 4th or whatever party couldn’t find a believable candidate, so the two continue to dominate. A viable 3rd Party really missed its chance in 2016. So many hated both of them that a realistic candidate would have had a chance.
Voting should be compulsory.
Election Day should be a National Holiday.
the woke/fake libertarian?
That’s your opinion. So what?
And who cares about your opinion ?
now were getting somewhere
This dude is the most arrogant ss I have ever met. He thinks he is some sage that everyone hops on to see what he thinks about …whatever. Who cares about anyones opinion on here or anywhere? Why even have an opinion site ?
yet you persist….I opine w/o expectation but engage as honestly as I can, you do not
counter point, which side is actively removing reproductive autonomy? pick your poison
I have, it’s Chase Oliver. You drink the poison, I’m voting with my principles and against both poisons.
Telling me to pick a poison and drink it because it’ll be less toxic than the other can’t move me because I’m voting against being forced to do that. So drink up in good plenty, since it’s what you believe you must do it, just as you’ve always been told to do it.
I don’t take well to being told what to do and not do too much, if you haven’t noticed. I’m one of those weirdos who wants to keep what few rights and liberties we have left. You favor reducing them, including with your vote. So be it, but I shan’t accompany you down that path.
eh, still a waited vote and will allow whichever evil to be inducted, it is a vote for status quo trying to dress up with a moral superiority that, while valid, is not realistic
Also, you didn’t express a shred of concern over S230 and what the system you fervently support (you keep arguing I should pick one side of that coin, so QED) wants to happen when they take it away.
Oh, and you also are supporting an agenda to radically undermine the SCOTUS by voting for Harris. What a wonderful fucking idea, to make the weakest branch even weaker and more political.
i do not have a stance on s230, above my pay grade, but sites should moderate
Site can and do moderate to their own policies. Demanding sites moderate to an unknown standard or face legal consequences? That’s something else entirely.
The death of S230 is a win for the censors, and you won’t oppose it? Why not, because you want Tony to get screwed in court?
it is an open question, how far the liability goes is still undetermined.
by not wanting a baby to be murdered in the womb?
as opposed to a classroom?
let’s have stupid arguments, or not
what about removing a dead fetus?
yep, let’s go to the most obscure/extreme example we can find
That’s what you’re doing with the “life begins at fertilization” bullshit. Simplistic solution for simplistic minds who care nothing for the suffering y’all want to cause.
So it is ok to kill poor people? And yet I am the delusional unsympathetic
Stop putting up your strawman projections of me. I said no such thing.
You’re the one wanting to ruin millions of lives to make you feel morally righteous, same as the extreme Left does. Fallacies won’t save you in this discussion.
Maybe they should have thought about that before they had unprotected sex
How do you know it was unprotected? How do you know the woman decided?
Oh, right. You simply don’t care about them. Only the fetus that you’ll stop caring about when they’re born. Yay, you, the authoritarian who knows what’s best for others and is willing to force it on others.
Why do you hate freedom so much?
Why do you hate poor people so much? Why do you like chopping up babies so much?
why do you hate bodily autonomy?
If you are the only liver doner that can save my life, should you be compelled to donate?
I’m not the one saying it is ok to butcher a fetus. So don’t give me a lecture on bodily autonomy , ok
what if I was legally empowered to remove a kidney fot translate?
is the kidney alive and devolping with brain activity and personhood? Will it become a fully functioning human being if left to its own devices?
personhood s a different argument which I’m happy to address if you answer the question.
fetus do not have a socio-economic class, the mother does and they encompass the spectrum
Does a fetus have human DNA?
A fetus is a parasite.
not the question. Does a fetus have HUMAN DNA?
define human DNA, we share 99% with bonobos, chimps, gorillas, where is the line drawn?
Only 2 fertile humans can produce human offspring, correct?
no
ok so something other than a human fertile sperm and a human viable egg can produce human offspring?
I’ve no idea, by human do you mean homo sapien sapien?
well ya
not obscure all all, do a modicum of research
You’d rather the baby to be born into miserable poverty with a parent that wasn’t ready to raise them?
Abortion’s often tragic, but don’t you fucking believe that the women who get them haven’t agonized over the decision, the decision you want taken away. You want to ruin lives so you can know that every woman must carry it to term, or die trying. That’s absolutely immoral, because you’ll never spend a dime out of your own pocket to support the women you want to impose your choice on.
Now go waste your vote on the ruling Duopoly, too.
I support this message
That is a very Eugenice argument. Lets terminate the poor, ok, fine. Say goodbye to thousands of people who have shaped our society for the better over the years
Uh-uh. Eugenics is a form of gov’t control, same as banning abortion.
You’re barking up the wrong tree with that red herring.
Do you know the history of planned parenthood?
This isn’t about Planned Parenthood, so quit trying to change the subject.
And I study history, so asking if I know about that is absurd. I’m very aware of this history of the eugenics movement, and if you are taking the position that any group that has espoused it is forever tainted by it, have you driven a Ford lately?
Planned parenthood basically made abortion easily accessible to a huge swath of women who otherwise would not have access to the practice. Its founder was Margerett Sanger who was a racist. She had similar views as you do, i.e, exterminate the inconvenience of society such as poor people and minorities. Once we say we can abort poor people, then the lid is off. Then it is ok to kill any child in the womb if they belong to a group deemed as unwanted by society.
and the KKK was founded by Dems that were the conservative party ATM, then Dixiecrats in the “60s….context
so if I said ” black babies should be killed because of all the racism they will experience” what would your response be
why would anyone say such a thing?
Did you hear see what he just said?
what?
the rich do not abort?
or it’s ok, because……
Chase Oliver, remember?
i do not
Chase Daniel was not good, but not evil
Not was, and given the state of the Duopoly you faithfully support, “not evil” is good simply by comparison.
And keep in mind that Harris was never democratically nominated, but appointed at the last minute. That’s who’s going to “save democracy”? Look at he history as a prosecutor, it’s awful, the things she’s done with power. She hasn’t changed, either.
Oh, and she’s not interested in being interviewed, either, so she’s an opaque candidate, no transparency.
BTW, I was watching some podcasts of Nicole Shanahan the past couple days. She is RFK JR’s running mate. She went into great detail of how it was soley the Dems that did everything they could to keep them off the ballot. So much for saving democracy
Robert F Kennedy was an awesome candidate
could have done some great work as president
How extreme is the DEM party that they run off a Kennedy (the son of RFK nonetheless ) out of the party?
same could be asked of Cheny’s daughter
A Neo Con Rino?
A drug addled idiot?
RFK Jr is a mess
and his entire family knows and is embarassed by him
how is he a mess?
Bears, worms
whale head removal
And he comes from a family of dedicated political schemers who will do anything to protect and grow their wealth.
pretty much sums up every politician ever
Incorrect, most politicians are the only example of success in politics for that family. The Kennedys have been doing is as an entire family for generations.
They stand out from the run of the mill, and it was Joe’s plan all along.
she was graded as one of the most conservative members for yrs
You are kidding, right? He’s as loony as the fake republican running for President
25 yrs ago, maybe
more like 1968
ha, misread
Like using his bully pulpit to sow his idea that vaccines cause autism, for starters? That’s categorically untrue, and has repeatedly proven to be untrue, and he doesn’t care. His belief outweighs the facts, so eveyone should believe it.
He has challenged plenty of ”experts ” to debate him on that claim. All have declined as far as I know
because it’s a stupid debate?
So why not annihilate him once and for all ? These experts should wipe the floor with him if he is so wrong
has he published peer reviewed papers?
on vaccines? I don’t know. Why does that matter? He is a major public figure and one of the biggest vax skeptics on Vax’s. You would think one of the lab coats would bite the public and take him down for the public good if he is spreading such false and dangerous misinformation
an expert would have peer reviewed papers and studied to support a proposition….why entertain someone who does not.
Fine. Just don’t say he is spreading dangerous ideas if you refuse to refute them
I refute them en masse, bring em one one by one, can do that too
so what are these doctors afraid of?
wating their time and lending credibilty
Doesn’t it give him credibility if it looks like they are afraid to debate him?
you cannot cite his support, stalemate
the moon is made of cheese…prove me wrong, coward….it’s silly
Because he’ll act like you, and simply deny inconvenient facts that thwart is fervent beliefs.
An actual archeologist took on Graham Hancock on Joe Rogan, devastated Hancock’s nonsense, and Rogan and Hancock still believe he lost to Hancock.
That’s what comes of debating people like you and RFK Jr. Everything’s made up and the facts don’t matter.
I haven’t seen that episode. Maybe I will check it out. I’m not saying I agree with RFK JR on most vacccines. I’m just saying that the fact not one of these guys will debate this man on that issue and it is a little telling
it’s not
it isn’t to you because you are an establishment shill /hack who never asks questions
she was on the primary ballot, such as it was,
I am dealing with the current practicability, the esoteric is a waste of time now
Honestly, that’s fine.
I think it’s a silly waste of the right that thousands of people died to give you, but at least you used it.
And if we ourselves fought to maintain that right?
We can vote twice :)
2020 all over again
context was veterans get to vote twice
a joke
Then you must care about the voting rights of those being purged from voter rolls.
The worst part about democracy is that people are free to vote themselves into horrific situations.
Then you should really know the value of it
even if spent at a lower value than desired, i.e. 3rd party, the franchise must be exercised, if that value can be even marginally higher the option should be considered, if not imperative
I never said how, other than by your conscience
Your vote affects me. I’ll give my opinion as I please. Just like you did.
All I ask is that you carefully consider the affect your vote will have on our history. Use wisdom and critical thinking rather than your feelings.
that’s all I’m asking
If you knew me, you’d understand that’s like asking air to be gaseous.
And for the record, I also wrote the blank check (but did not deploy)
Sorry, I’m not trying to come at you or question your patriotism.
https://thehill.com/homenews/4854535-jack-white-trump-campaign-white-stripes-song/
“Law suit coming from my lawyers about this (to add to your five thousand others,)” White, one-half of the rock duo The White Stripes, wrote to his nearly 700,000 followers.
Nic Jones gets cut
Chiefs Add Cowboys DB, Cut Nic Jones
s://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/chiefs-add-cowboys-db-cut-nic-jones/ar-AA1pFSZ5?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=1779f46dbe4f46f681eb3fcf8b5c200e&ei=11
who got cut for Perine addition?
Don’t know
Don’t see Perine or Scott or Jones on the roster
The Kansas City Chiefs are a recent example of this, as they made a change following the announcement of their initial 53-man roster. After successfully claiming former Dallas Cowboys cornerback Eric Scott Jr. off the waiver wire, the Chiefs released fellow defensive back Nic Jones.
poor Murray State
five and a half minutes into 1st quarter down 21-0
sounds like our game in the playoffs a few years ago
I doubt Murray State will mount an epic comeback
Streaming live now. Chiefs THE FRANCHISE. Episode 2
thanks
check your voter registration, and voter your conscience
there are 2 options, like it or not…gotta decide or sit out, and sitting out includes write-in or /3rd party (if on a ballot).
Please do not sit out
(hashtag)MakeAmericaBeautifulAgain2024AndThenFourYearsLaterKeepAmericaBeautiful
none part of the binary option, sadly
Voting my conscience.
I can’t in good faith vote for either one, which has been the case since I became old enough to vote so long ago.
that is fallacious, there are 2 only viable options, especially now.
one must logically be more aligned with your views, if not I question your views
Yeah this makes no sense whatsoever.
Are either candidates my top choice? Hell no.
But one is clearly a worse choice by anyone with any conscience whatsoever. Not voting or voting for Mickey Mouse is a copout, a really weak copout.
Foolish.
Agree. These are your choices. Pick.
Did you canvas for who you wanted?
Did who you want even want to run?
Did you run yourself?
Are you willing to sit down and shut up about who wins and be happy with whatever you get?
No?
Then go vote.
Sitting this one out is … insane.
unconscionable and a dereliction of civic duty imnsho
If choosing between Satan and Lucifer are my only options, sitting out is the noble path
I’m sorry, but one is clearly less competent and bent on dragging the country into chaos. At least the other is not a convicted felon who has gotten away with many more crimes (both in court and out).
Saying they are equally bad is just a blatant lie.
Installing loyalists ain’t democracy in any form, despite the fact it’s not perfect now.
but the trains will run on time…..fun fact, they did not
You know what’s not democracy?
Ignoring the constitution, trying to fake votes, trying to stay in power by the use of force when you can’t “find” those votes, etc etc etc etc etc.
One person follows the GD MF law, the other breaks it as often as possible.
One of these people WILL BE PRESIDENT in January, no matter whatever philosophical thing you’re talking about. Choose wisely.
I agree; I was referring to Project 2025, GA Election Board.
one of my favorite things is “all the best people”…I granted grace at first cause he would have real policy people, that did not last, highest cabinet turnover in decades
all his best at first are now cowards, weak, dumb etc….a vote for him is Kash Patel as head of something, or Tucker Carlson.
Spare me the ideological bs
👍👍
then don’t bitch about the gov’t,
also Satan is humanity’s greatest advocate, lucifer is a made up name not in the bible
Even if you pick the lesser of evils, do that, because ont voting is voting for the greater evil by not supporting the lesser.
I need more TV’s
So does this mean Wednesday is over?
Yep, and Tuesdays gone with the wind…
Dang. Where does the time go?
It keeps on slippin’, slippin’, slippin’ into the future
Not sure, seems it just keeps on ticking into the future…tic-toc-tic…
I could live with a mid-season suspension, if nothing is said and then they drop one that includes playoffs I’ll be pissed
Think he’s in a he clear for 24 season..
hope you’re right
Stupid kid
That is worst case if it is gonna happen this year. Rip the band aid off quick and get it over with. Don’t wait until we need him for playoff seating/post season
Well then I guess Juju is just an extra weapon for us. Yay!